December 2007

OHIO

12-21-07 -- I been victimized by the courts in Mahoning County, and Trumbull County, Ohio. I represented myself in several cases.; mostly for collections. 

I have lost cases even when my adversary admit they owe my company money. 

Filing a complaint against a judge or attorney is a total waste of time. The discipline committee of the Ohio Supreme Court is simply there for the appearance of justice. 

The courts in these counties stink. The judges are above the law and there is no practicable recourse. I have provided testimony to the Pro Se Task Force of Ohio; they totally miss the point. It is stocked with persons that had no idea of the problems before the court.

It is no wonder that people have no respect for the black robed victimizers.

                                                                               Grengamachine

November 2007

NEW YORK

Judicial Perjury* – a Black Wall of Silence Tragedy

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

For further information: Jorge Bernal

917-270-2498 / 718-235-7472

11-17-07 -- The New York State Appellate Department Second Division’s Decision and Order on Mr. Jorge Bernal’s appeal is a flagrant judicial tragedy to protect a judicial perjurer, Family Court Judge Salvatore Modica.

The Decision was published on November 9, 2007, on the Appellant Department’s website.

Mr. Bernal’s Brief requested a new hearing on his Motion to Vacate Final Order, the removal of Judge Modica from the bench and Judge Modica’s disbarment. Mr. Bernal’s Brief contains, among others, factually documented lies, fabrications of evidence and inflammatory statements of Judge Modica in his Order and Decision of March 6, 2007.

The Appellant Department denied Mr. Bernal’s appeal wrongfully based on a failure to establish a good cause and failure to have provided evidence in a timely manner. In addition, the Appellant Department stated that all other contentions were without merit.

The crux of Mr. Bernal’s anger is the fact that it was clearly established in his Brief that Judge Modica had held ex-parte communications, with counsel representing the opposing party, for the purpose of cutting Mr. Bernal’s oral arguments off.  

Mr. Bernal contents that he could not argue his ‘good cause’ and ‘timely evidence’ because he was cut off. Mr. Bernal is a self-represented. The Decisions, Brief and Certified Court Transcripts can be found in Mr. Bernal’s website www.kangaroo-court.net.

Victims-of-Law Commentary

When a judge commits Judicial Perjury* you know the “fix” is in favor of a certain litigant. Judges who insert obvious “false facts” into their opinions are operating under a corrupt influence – it’s easier to change the ‘facts’ to fit statutory law, case law, rules of evidence & court rules. Appellate courts will always sanction the trial court judge’s facts no matter how false they are even if they are proven to the nth degree.

“Over the years, when we suspected a judge was corrupt, we examined their rulings to see if there are judicial perjuries. An honest judge, mis-stating the undisputed facts, would quickly correct wrong statements. A crooked judge, even when confronted *** refuses.” -- SHERMAN H. SKOLNICK

*Judicial Perjury was coined by Sherman H. Skolnick (deceased).

CONNECTICUT

Correction officials apologize for wrongful imprisonment

11-5-07 – (AP) State court officials have apologized for a series of errors that led to the wrongful arrest and imprisonment of a New Britain woman. . . . Aracellie Delgado was subpoenaed to Hartford Family Court on Oct. 24 for a civil proceeding related to a visitation agreement with the father of her three children. Judicial Branch officials confirm that, due to a mistake, Delgado's name did not appear on the docket and she was not required to appear. . . . She filed papers to be notified of future court dates and left. However, the judge called for Delgado's appearance and when she did not appear, she was arrested at her home the next day. . . . "It was embarrassing to be led out of my own home," she said. . . . Officials took Delgado, 28, into custody without any time to make arrangements for her children, ages 1, 7 and 12, she said. The marshal allowed her to call her mother from his cell phone as she was taken to York Correctional Institution, the state's prison for women, she said. . . . "They just left my kids alone," Delgado said. . . . She was processed at the prison, ordered to shower using lye soap and dress in prison clothes. She remained incarcerated until the next morning, when she was brought to the Hartford Civil Court.

Click a link to access subject:
 Legal Research / Family Law / Legal Writing / Legal Ethics

September 2007

KENTUCKY

Black farmer files judicial complaint against federal judge

by Monica Davis ( davis4000_2000 [at] yahoo.clm )

9-24-07 -- Harry Young, a black farmer whose land was sold in an allegedly illegal auction by the Farm Services Administration has filed a legal complaint in the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals against a sitting federal judge in Owensboro, Kentucky. . . . Harry Young, a black farmer from Owensboro, Kentucky has upped the ante in his quest to regain possession of his farm and overturn what many farm activists claim was an illegal auction. Young has filed a complaint against the Western District of US Court in Owensboro, in the 6th Circuit of the US Court of Appeals in Cincinnati. . . . The farm has been in the Young family since the late 19th century and contains valuable mineral rights--at least $18 million dollars worth of coal reserves. A major point of contention is whether those reserves were included in the $500,000 sale of the farm. Young says that he has been denied access to documents which would verify whether these valuable reserves were included in the half a million dollar sale. . . . Filing for himself in a pro se argument, Young's complaint says: "It is the purpose of the ancient institution of property to protect those claims which people rely in their daily lives, and this reliance must not be arbitrarily undermined; it is a purpose of the constitutional right to a hearing, protected by procedural due proces, to provide an opportunity for a person to vindicate those claims. (Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 US ]564, 92 s Ct 2701 33 Led 2d 548)

Harry Young’s website

August 2006

MASSACHUSETTS   

Lawyer vows to fight her disbarment

By Associated Press

Controversial lawyer and former gubernatorial candidate Barbara Johnson said she will fight her disbarment this week by the state's highest court to the US Supreme Court. . . . Johnson, who's been highly critical of the state court system, called the disbarment process a ``kangaroo court" and compared Massachusetts to a Third World country. . . . ``They'll disbar me, which is fine; I'll write my judicial murder mysteries," Johnson told The Eagle-Tribune of Lawrence on Thursday. ``I'm going to kill off a judge in the prologue of every one. It'll be like a Where's Waldo murder mystery, and I'll use real names for the judges." . . . Johnson was disbarred for charges including putting sensitive confidential information from two of her cases on her website, refusing to pay legal fines after being held in contempt, and conducting herself in an ``insulting, vituperative" manner in court.

Victims-of-Law Commentary -- Barbara Johnson, in all likelihood, is being retaliated against for taking unpopular positions and exposing judicial corruption. A web page will be set-up on this site.

Charles Lincoln's Trials & Tribulations

Older Articles: Victims Review

The Terri Schindler-Schiavo Story

THE ON-GOING JUDICIAL ARROGANCE OF JUDGE GREER