CONSTITUTIONAL & CIVIL RIGHTS / RULE-OF-LAW / REIN IN JUDICIAL IMMUNITY / JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY /

 

The Franciszek (Frank) C. Kulon Story

HELP KEEP
VICTIMS-OF-LAW
ON THE WEB

CLICK & SHOP

OR

CONTRIBUTE NOW


DIRECTORY

HOME

ABOUT / CONTACT

TERMS / CONDITIONS

LEGAL DISCLAIMER

JUSTICE MYTHOLOGY


News & Views

ATTORNEYS & JUDGES

ATTORNEY NEWS

ATTORNEY NEWS REVIEW

JUDICIARY NEWS

BANKRUPTCY COURTS

IMMIGRATION COURTS

JUDICIARY NEWS REVIEW

JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY

JUDICIAL ACTIVISM & INACTIVISM

JUDICIAL ACTIVISM
NEWS & VIEWS

JUDGES SPEAKING OUT
FOR "WE THE PEOPLE"

PERSPECTIVES
 (Personal Observations)

U.S. SUPREME COURT

SCOTUS PG. 1

SCOTUS PG. 2

CURRENT SESSION


CRIMINAL LAW

Death Penalty

DEATH PENALTY ARCHIVES

DEATH PENALTY REPORTS

Innocents In Prison

Prison Reform


DISABILITY LAW

DISABILITY LAW

DISABILITY ARCHIVES


FAMILY LAW

Children's Rights

CHILDREN'S RIGHTS PG. 2

Family INFO  (General)

family LAW (archives)

family LAW articles
 
  Courtesy lawyers weekly

Fatherhood

Fatherhood Archives

Motherhood

MOTHERHOOD ARCHIVES


PROBATE LAW

guardianship


RELIGIOUS PERSECUTION

RELIGIOUS NEWS & VIEWS

RELIGIOUS NEWS 2006

FIRST AMENDMENT:
RELIGION & EXPRESSION


SELF-REPRESENTED
(Pro Se News)

PRO SE INFORMATION


REFORMERS

LEGAL ACTIVISTS

LEGAL ACTIVISTS Pg. 2


WHISTLEBLOWER  LAW

LEGAL & COURT BUSINESS

GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES


INDEXES
TO SPECIAL
SECTIONS

FEDERAL COURTS INDEX

FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS

JUDGING THE JUDGES
INDEX & RESOURCES

STATE INDEXES

FLORIDA

NEW JERSEY

NEW YORK

SOUTH DAKOTA

PRO SE INDEX

REFORMERS INDEX

WHISTLEBLOWER INDEX


LEGAL RESEARCH

LEGAL RESEARCH
(FREE SITES
)

ALSO SEE INDIVIDUAL STATE INDEXES


REFORM GROUPS

DISABILITY ACTIVISTS

FAMILY LAW

CHILDREN

FATHERHOOD

MOTHERHOOD

LEGAL REFORM ACTIVISTS

MAJOR REFORM GROUPS

PRO SE (SELF-HELP)

PRISON REFORM

DEATH PENALTY

WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS


MEDIA LINKS


PETITIONS

PEOPLE WHO HAVE
GONE PUBLIC

Frank Kulon's crime?
Expressing his First Amendment Rights through Oil Paintings!

The judge sued but that's not the end of the story.


9-15-07 UPDATE:

Artist wins settlement in lawsuit against Sullivan

Recordonline.com

8-4-07 -- Local artist Franciszek Kulon won a $40,000 settlement in his lawsuit against Sullivan County, he announced through an e-mail yesterday. . . . Kulon sued the county government after his painting was taken down from a gallery of 600 pieces of art in the county government center because it was controversial and politically charged. . . . The painting depicted three nude cherubs, one draped in the American flag, dropping a hand grenade on two children. Kulon claimed the removal of his art was censorship and a violation of his constitutional rights. . . . In 2003, then County Manager Dan Briggs said the painting was “inappropriate” for display in the county government center. . . . Attorney Michael Sussman, who represented Kulon, would not confirm the amount of the artist’s settlement, but said it was “fair and appropriate for what occurred.”


"Themis - Lady of Justice"

(SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SULLIVAN, USA)

Oil on canvas 108" X 66" (274cm x 168cm )

Click to see "Themis - Lady of Justice"


First Amendment tested by unflattering portrait

-- Times Herald-Record --

Can art still be just art? Can we talk about it?

-- The River Reporter --

Defamation & Artistic Expression

-- Art on Trial --

Panel Dismisses Privacy Claim Brought
by Justice Satirized  by Artist as Demon

ALTBACH v. KULON

Click above title for Appellate Court Opinion

Is it okay to shoot someone in retaliation?

INTERNET RELEASE

January 30, 2005

Attorney General Eliot Spitzer
New York State
The Capital, Albany, NY

Dear Mr. Spitzer:

I am very concerned that an attempt was made against my life and nothing was done about this crime. 

When I ask local authorities about this they tell me to talk with lawyers, but lawyers say that they cannot help me against the District Attorney's office. 

I sent a letter like this to Stephen F. Lungen, District Attorney, County of Sullivan, Monticello, New York, but I never received an answer from him. 

My explanation below, and the enclosed subpoena documents should help explain my very real concern.

I am an immigrant from Poland. I received no help from local authorities in this matter. Local authorities have thrown me in jail many times with no good cause, and have called me filthy names and a "communist." 

In fact, I fled Poland to avoid communist oppression many years ago.

It took several years for me to obtain the Information documents I enclose. I had asked about them many times but was told each time that they did not exist or that the case had gone away. 

I also received a subpoena to testify before a Grand Jury about this matter, how my neighbor, James D'Ambrose, a friend and crony of local authorities, had shot at me. The Grand Jury investigation never happened, and I was never asked to testify about what happened at all.

Mr. D'Ambrose had been harassing me for years by filing complaints against me.  These were frivolous and simply dismissed, but I was often thrown in jail.  Finally, he tried to kill me with his shotgun. The enclosed subpoena documents were filed against him for this, including for felonies and misdemeanors.  I now understand that D'Ambrose was allowed to plead guilty to the least serious charge. 

The felony charge of 1st degree Reckless Endangerment for shooting at me was dismissed.  Mr. D'Ambrose was allowed to move out of town. I would like this case to be opened against D'Ambrose for at least the felony charge, if not for attempted murder. If this can't happen, then I would like to know the circumstances of why this very dangerous man, a friend of the local legal authorities, was allowed to get away with attempted murder with only a slap on the hand, and with no testimony or other input from me. 

I especially think this should happen for the following reasons:

  • D'Ambrose did not just "shoot within 500 feet of a dwelling."  He shot directly toward me with a 12 gage shotgun and, even according to the information, penetrated the front tire of my tractor less than three feet from where I was sitting, putting me in grave risk of death.

  • The investigator who signed this most serious subpoena information, Geoffrey Cabrera, told me that D'Ambrose admitted to trying to kill me. Cabrera asked D'Ambrose why he did this, and D'Ambrose gave him "twenty reasons" why he tried to kill me. 

I think Cabrera would testify about this and can help put a very dangerous man in jail, where he belong.

Please consider causing this case to be reopened, because I do not think justice has been done, and I do not think that the people are protected when very serious charges are dismissed. If you cannot do this, please help me understand how this can happen in a society where local authorities should protect even immigrants like me, and even against their friends and cronies.
Sincerely,

Franciszek Kulon

 

Win Without a Lawyer
Step-by-step tutorials show how.
Legal self-help that works!

Written by an attorney!

Order from
Jurisdictionary today!

When placing an order please use this website to link to Jurisdictionary.



Picture that caused the justice's lawsuit

"Our Honorable Judge
of  Liberty"

ORIGINAL OIL PAINTING BY CONTROVERSIAL NEW YORK

ARTIST FRANCISZEK C. KULON.

This painting is one of several painted by Kulon in response to his beliefs about cronyism and mistreatment of immigrants in Sullivan County, NY. . . . A photo of this painting was published on the front page of the Times Herald-Record, to accompany an article about a $1,500,000.00 lawsuit, filed against Kulon by a Sullivan County official, over what he thought was his derogatory image in a Kulon painting


READ
Rebellion Alone is not Patriotism

By: Jurisdictionary's
Attorney, Frederick Graves 


CLICK BELOW

TO ORDER

First Amendment Books



SEND
NEWS RELEASES

VIA EMAIL

 

Join

Victims-of-Law
Open Discussion

Click here to join victimsoflaw_discuss
Click to join victimsoflaw_discuss

 

 

 

Upon such review, we conclude that Supreme Court correctly found that the painting and its publication in defendant's flyers are artistic expressions -- specifically a caricature and parody of plaintiff in his public role as a town justice -- that are entitled to protection under the First Amendment and excepted from New York's privacy protections.

 

We find that the similarity of poses between the photograph and the painting, together with the content of the advertising copy identifying plaintiff as an experienced attorney, attest to the accuracy of defendant's portrayal of plaintiff's face and posture, while emphasizing that the painting is a caricature and parody of the public image presented in plaintiff's own advertisement. As a result, the photograph's use can readily be viewed as ancillary to a protected artistic expression because it "'prove[s] the worth and illustrate[s] the content'" of the painting exhibited at defendant's gallery.

 

ALTBACH v. KULON

Due to server's technical difficulties the numbering restarted on 6/19/06
As of 6/19/06 you are visitor number

Hit Counter

Inaugurated on January 31, 2005
Updated: 01/25/2008