CONSTITUTIONAL & CIVIL RIGHTS / RULE-OF-LAW / REIN IN JUDICIAL IMMUNITY / JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY /

 

"Kooky Laws"

 

HELP KEEP
VICTIMS-OF-LAW
ON THE WEB

SHOP OUR ADVERTISERS

OR CONTRIBUTE NOW

DIRECTORY

HOME

ABOUT / CONTACT

TERMS / CONDITIONS

LEGAL DISCLAIMER

JUSTICE MYTHOLOGY


News & Views

ATTORNEYS & JUDGES

ATTORNEY NEWS

ATTORNEY NEWS REVIEW

JUDICIARY NEWS

BANKRUPTCY COURTS

IMMIGRATION COURTS

JUDICIARY NEWS REVIEW

JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY

JUDICIAL ACTIVISM & INACTIVISM

JUDICIAL ACTIVISM
NEWS & VIEWS

JUDGES SPEAKING OUT
FOR "WE THE PEOPLE"

PERSPECTIVES
 (Personal Observations)

U.S. SUPREME COURT

CURRENT SESSION

GENERAL NEWS & VIEWS


Criminal Law Index

2011 NEWS & VIEWS

Death Penalty

Innocents In Prison

Prison Reform


DISABILITY LAW

DISABILITY LAW

DISABILITY ARCHIVES


Family Law Index

2012 NEWS & VIEWS

Childrens' rights

Family LAW 

Fatherhood

Motherhood

family LAW articles
 
  Courtesy lawyers weekly

FAMILY LAW REVIEWS


PROBATE LAW

guardianship


RELIGIOUS PERSECUTION

RELIGIOUS NEWS & VIEWS

RELIGIOUS NEWS 2006

FIRST AMENDMENT:
RELIGION & EXPRESSION


Pro Se Index
(Self-Representation)

PRO SE NEWS & VIEWS


REFORMERS

LEGAL ACTIVISTS

LEGAL ACTIVISTS Pg. 2


WHISTLEBLOWER  LAW

LEGAL & COURT BUSINESS

GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES


INDEXES
TO SPECIAL
SECTIONS

FEDERAL COURTS INDEX

FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS

JUDGING THE JUDGES
INDEX & RESOURCES

STATE INDEXES

FLORIDA

NEW JERSEY

NEW YORK

SOUTH DAKOTA

PRO SE INDEX

REFORMERS INDEX

WHISTLEBLOWER INDEX


LEGAL RESEARCH

LEGAL RESEARCH
(FREE SITES
)

ALSO SEE INDIVIDUAL STATE INDEXES


RESOURCES & REFORM GROUPS

CRIMINAL LAW

DISABILITY LAW

FAMILY LAW

LEGAL REFORM ACTIVISTS

MAJOR REFORM GROUPS

PRO SE (SELF-HELP)


MEDIA LINKS


PETITIONS

PEOPLE WHO HAVE
GONE PUBLIC


News, Views & Advice about Kooky Laws



468x60 15% off Any Order!


Beware of Legal Mythology!

( From the Official "How to Win in Court" Course )

Many today are angry at our justice system.

Many have good cause to be angry!

Some, however, are too angry!

Their anger will hurt you!

They are blinded by their anger!

You'll recognize them by the anger. They are not your friend! Their "legal theories" fail. They are blinded by rage. Believe them at your peril.

#1 An angry fellow called to scream obscenities because I refused to agree with him that our birth certificates are some kind of "contract". The fundamental truth about contracts is that they cannot bind anyone who doesn't understand the agreement. Besides, we certainly didn't sign the thing! We can't be bound by a contract we don't understand and didn't sign. Yet, this man screamed at me for refusing to help him fight his dragons!

#2 Another angry person called insisting she had "copyrighted" her name so the courts couldn't use her name on official papers. To think one can prevent others from using one's name by "copyrighting" it is utter nonsense. Anger twists the mind in strange ways!

#3 Some are convinced our courts are "admiralty courts" and cannot rule in common law or statute, all because there is a yellow fringe on the courtroom flag. This lie has been promoted for years by angry people that don't know (or don't want to make any effort to know) the truth.

#4 Many have made a "religion" out of believing such lies. Some claim to be "patriots", yet do all they can to evade the Rule of Law and refuse to do anything toward learning the principles of due process so many gave their lives to protect in past and present wars!

#5 Thousands share emails and hover around the radio to hear commentators tell them how horrible things are and how much worse they soon will be, yet only a handful talk about how to make things better by exercising your "law power" in court!

I know people are hurting. We've helped tens of thousands of hurting people to get justice in the courts since 1997 when we launched Jurisdictionary on the web.

Do you want to know how to get justice in our courts and honor the sacrifices of millions who died so you would have the "law power" you need to overcome corruption?

Are you ready to begin?

www.Jurisdictionary.com


February 2012

'Sovereign citizen' movement now on FBI's radar

The Homeland Security Department has ranked the movement as a major threat. Its members reject the law, and some kill police.

By Brian Bennett, Washington Bureau, Los Angeles Times  

02-23-12 -- With the FBI pounding on his door, and his wife and two children barely awake, Shawn Rice allegedly strapped on a bulletproof vest, grabbed a semiautomatic pistol and stepped out his back door on Dec. 22. . . . But dozens of FBI agents and local police had surrounded the ranch house in Seligman, Ariz., about 80 miles west of Flagstaff, and the only nearby cover was knee-high sagebrush. Rice ducked back inside, and warned the FBI to keep away. . . . After a tense 10-hour standoff, Rice, 49, was arrested. He now sits in a Las Vegas jail awaiting trial on federal money-laundering charges. . . . But it wasn't Rice's alleged offense alone that prompted the FBI's interest. . . . According to court papers, Rice was involved in the "sovereign citizen" movement, a group that has attracted little national media attention but which the FBI classifies as an "extremist antigovernment group." So-called sovereign citizens argue that they are not subject to local, state or federal laws, and some refuse to recognize the authority of courts or police.


Additional Advice for Pro Se Litigants

Rebellion Alone is not Patriotism


October 2008

FLORIDA

State sues to stop liens by 'sovereign' couple

By Rene Stutzman, Sentinel Staff Writer

VoL comment:

Too many people are being hoodwinked into filing these ill conceived lawsuits.

10-14-08 -- Donna and Joel Brinkle used to own 5 acres in Geneva. That's where they raised their family. Joel worked as a manager at Florida Power & Light Co. Donna is a former deputy court clerk. . . . Then, in the 1990s, they stopped paying taxes and declared themselves independent of all government authority. They have been battling government ever since.http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/images/pixel.gif. . . Joel, 76, went to jail. The IRS went after their money, and Seminole County sold their home because of unpaid taxes. . . . Now, they face a new battle: Florida's attorney general is suing them, accusing them of fraud and harassment for filing a lien naming four Seminole County officials: Sheriff Don Eslinger; State Attorney Norm Wolfinger; Clerk of Courts Maryanne Morse; and Clayton Simmons, chief judge of the 18th judicial circuit. . . . The couple recorded the lien in April, claiming ownership of every piece of property held by those officials. . . . The suit asks a judge to throw out the claim and to ban the Brinkles from filing any more liens against public officials, unless it is done by an attorney or with a court order. It also asks a judge to bar the state and the county from accepting any more liens from the couple unless they are done by an attorney or with a court order. . . . Dozens of liens in 6 years. . . . ll told, the Brinkles have filed more than two dozen liens in the past six years, according to government records. . . . They name many people, including former President Clinton, a Sanford lawyer who sued the Brinkles in a land dispute, a Longwood company that towed their vehicle and a deputy court clerk who insisted that the Brinkles pay the standard fee to record a document. . . . They file those liens, Donna Brinkle said, to fight back against people who have done them wrong. . . . "They try to persecute my husband and myself to keep us from living a normal and peaceable life when we do absolutely nothing to harm another soul," she said. . . . Liens allow creditors a way to collect money they're owed.


Please don't do any "Kooky Law" stuff!

Posted by: Torm Howse indianacrc@earthlink.net  

Torm Howse is the National Board Director, United Civil Rights Councils of America

Please don't get involved in any "kooky law" stuff... i.e., the use of UCC concepts within family law, (valid elsewhere, like regular contract law, trade law, and etc., but not in the family law aspect of custody itself), the gold fringe on flag thing, the Strawman thing, the courts and judges are "corporations" thing, any given bar association is a British spinoff thing, etc., etc., etc.

I recently saw this very good summary on the basic reasons *why* to shy away from this stuff, not the least of which is reasonably expecting to be instantly branded a nutcase by any (99.9%) of the general public.

Credit goes to Larry Becraft, who is largely responsible for *debunking* all of these kooky law stuff items:

“Destroyed Arguments” (legal collections explaining the nonsense of these various "kooky law" scams... i.e., the law itself, explaining why these crazy and wild goose chases are worthless, even though they "sound good"...)

Here's the quick overall nice summary of WHY I won't get involved with kooky law stuff, in a nutshell.

In case you don't know who Greg Hession is, go to http://www.massoutrage.com


* Warning - This is a kook alert.*
By Gregory A. Hession J.D. -- hession@crocker.com

I received an email from a Constitutional Law outfit run by a husband and wife named Jack and Margy Flynn, out of New Mexico, called Citizens of the American Constitution. They are planning to come to Massachusetts and do seminars, starting in Holyoke. Its web site is Citizens of the American Constitution.

I have reviewed the web site, and it is full of Kooky-Law terms like "Admiralty Law", "Sui Juris", "Perjury of Oaths", references to using the Uniform Commercial Code in civil matters that are not business related, and making objections about whether one's name is in upper or lower case in the heading on the pleadings, etc.

These things are very dangerous for a number of reasons:

First, they mislead the innocent and earnest person who has been hammered by the system to believe that there is a "silver bullet" method of winning, when it is not true.

Second, using these terms and tactics in court, that are recommended on their web site, results in instantly being branded a "kook" by the court. Often, the case never recovers after that.

Third, it's flat wrong, and dishonest. The Uniform Commercial Code does not apply to family cases, or speeding tickets, and our state courts are NOT using admiralty law (which is strictly federal procedure, dealing with vessels and injuries at sea).

Fourth, those good folks using these techniques often lose big, and often get fined for being frivolous. And I mean BIG. This happened to a client of mine, who now has a $1.2 million dollar judgment against him, only because he did honestly and innocently followed the advice of a kooky-law guru. I came in after it was all done, and couldn't undo the damage. The judgment stuck.

These people recommend making statements like the following to the judge prior to trial, if he doesn't "prove" his jurisdiction: "I would again inform him [the judge] that, by his own actions and responses, he committed _insurrection, sedition and treason_ against the American People, is a traitor to this Nation and its People, and must be removed from the bench for his treason. I will immediately file criminal and civil charges against him, personally, and in his professional capacity, and take action against him in an Article III federal court, which I will demand, by Motion." Telling a judge that he is committing insurrection, sedition and treason is a good way to get thrown in jail, never mind lose your case, when the case may have actually won on its merits. That is just nonsense.

Genuine patriot lawyers like Larry Becraft have debunked this stuff for years, and yet people continue to believe the scam artists who push this junk. See The Dixieland Law Journal, and scroll down to the links on Patriot Scams. The only one these guys missed was complaining about yellow fringes on the flag.

A certain percentage of these cases do win using these techniques because the court just doesn't want the hassle, such as when you ask for jury trials for speeding tickets. Hey, sometimes they just humor the person and let them go. Usually, however, the earnest patriot goes in, thinking he is armed with the truth, and gets his head handed to him.

Chase these guys out of town as fast as possible. They will do untold harm to everyone in this movement.

So, please, good people -- no "kooky law" stuff !!:

1. Regardless of whether there is *any valid* base to *any* of it, at all, it just doesn't matter.

2. America is dumb still, and hasn't yet re-awakened to its own roots of freedom and independence.

3. 98-99% of Americans, old and young alike, will instantly brand you a "kook", and for good reason.

4. NONE of that stuff is even NECESSARY, in the first place, since everything a person would want, for justice and accountability, is ALREADY in the law... even in the "modern" law... so, just get your justice using the available tools under the law as it is now, because there are plenty of ways to do it.

5. The "law" has not been the problem. Generally, the problem is that you are just one person, and they (the system) are not. What they can get away with, you cannot, because you are just person. Lesson: You need to become more than one person. Join with others. Work together. Just like that system does... Only, instead of dishonesty and corruption used by them to achieve fraud against you, use the power and truth of real law and facts -- backed up by bigger numbers of you -- to achieve accountability and judgment upon such lawbreakers.

Team up with others, and then use the law - the real law... Then you win.


Additional Advice for Pro Se Litigants

Rebellion Alone is not Patriotism


Win Without a Lawyer
Step-by-step tutorials show how.
Legal self-help that works!

Written by an attorney!

Order from
Jurisdictionary today!

IMPORTANT NOTE:
If ordering from Jurisdictionary, please click from a VoL ad otherwise we do not get any credit whatsoever.



United Civil Rights Councils of America

"Gender neutral. Child positive. Constitution mandatory."

Click for
10 Main Focus Areas

 
 

 

SEND PRO-SE NEWS RELEASES

VIA EMAIL


 

Victims-of-Law
Open Discussion

Click here to join victimsoflaw_discuss
Click to join victimsoflaw_discuss

 

 
     

 

 


"The court should be a place where anybody can come - whatever they have in their pocket - and be able to file a complaint in simple fashion and at least have somebody give consideration to it and give them an opportunity to be heard."

-- Thomas T. Curtin, Judge, U.S. District Court --  New York Times (7 Oct 1971)


***************

Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.

JOHN ADAMS (1732-1826), U. S. President, December 1770.

***************

"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored."

-- Aldous Huxley, A Note on Dogma, 1894-1963--

 

 

You are visitor number

Hit Counter

INAUGURATED ON: March 19, 2008
Updated on: 04/04/2012